<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Exactly Is Publishing Anyway? Take II.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://catalystbookpress.wordpress.com/2008/07/01/what-exactly-is-publishing-anyway-take-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://catalystbookpress.wordpress.com/2008/07/01/what-exactly-is-publishing-anyway-take-ii/</link>
	<description>The places, ideas, and people that change us</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 01:27:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: terena</title>
		<link>http://catalystbookpress.wordpress.com/2008/07/01/what-exactly-is-publishing-anyway-take-ii/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>terena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 01:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catalystbookpress.wordpress.com/?p=52#comment-148</guid>
		<description>I agree with your thoughts about the music industry. Bands make their own CD&#039;s all the time and no one cares, just as long as the music is good. The same should go for books, but for some reason it doesn&#039;t. Maybe it&#039;s because the technology to easily make a book is so new, compared to the technology of making music (before CD&#039;s there were thousands of tapes made by garage bands everywhere). 

I also agree with your definitions of what a Vanity press, and I agree a Vanity press isn&#039;t necesserely a bad thing, just as long as the quality of the work is good. That&#039;s my biggest problem with ALL forms of publising, and this goes for the big houses too. I&#039;ve read too many books that are poorly made and/or poorly written. It doesn&#039;t matter who published it, it&#039;s still a bad book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your thoughts about the music industry. Bands make their own CD&#8217;s all the time and no one cares, just as long as the music is good. The same should go for books, but for some reason it doesn&#8217;t. Maybe it&#8217;s because the technology to easily make a book is so new, compared to the technology of making music (before CD&#8217;s there were thousands of tapes made by garage bands everywhere). </p>
<p>I also agree with your definitions of what a Vanity press, and I agree a Vanity press isn&#8217;t necesserely a bad thing, just as long as the quality of the work is good. That&#8217;s my biggest problem with ALL forms of publising, and this goes for the big houses too. I&#8217;ve read too many books that are poorly made and/or poorly written. It doesn&#8217;t matter who published it, it&#8217;s still a bad book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Books and Magazines Blog &#187; Archive &#187; What Exactly Is Publishing Anyway? Take II.</title>
		<link>http://catalystbookpress.wordpress.com/2008/07/01/what-exactly-is-publishing-anyway-take-ii/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Books and Magazines Blog &#187; Archive &#187; What Exactly Is Publishing Anyway? Take II.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 19:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catalystbookpress.wordpress.com/?p=52#comment-119</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by Catalyst Book Press [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by Catalyst Book Press [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
